Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Long March of the Chinese Navy
nationalreview ^ | 09/26/2018 | Frank Lavin

Posted on 09/27/2018 7:34:25 AM PDT by chief lee runamok

With the launch of its second aircraft carrier, China has enhanced its position in the front ranks of military powers and prompted questions as to the ultimate purpose of its navy. The Chinese navy, formally known as the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN), is expanding and will be doing so for years — decades — to come. Some of this is the natural consequence of being the navy of a country in economic ascendancy. Some of this is bureaucratic politics; the PLA is represented on the Communist Party Central Committee, and the PLA answers to the Chinese Communist Party, not the Chinese government. But some of this, the interesting part, is what’s left after one accounts for normal economic growth and institutional self-interest. We might not just be seeing an updated navy or a more potent navy; we might be seeing a different navy, with a different mission.

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: nationalsecurity; plan; redchina; trumpasia

1 posted on 09/27/2018 7:34:25 AM PDT by chief lee runamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: chief lee runamok

First thing that comes to mind is the story of seven Chinese brothers swallowing the sea.


2 posted on 09/27/2018 7:37:15 AM PDT by real saxophonist (You can play a shoestring if you're sincere. - John Coltrane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist

I thought it was Japanese brothers...


3 posted on 09/27/2018 7:40:46 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Baseball players, gangsters and musicians are remembered. But journalists are forgotten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chief lee runamok

The ChiCom Empire has arrived.


4 posted on 09/27/2018 7:50:11 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

The M-3 tank on the Eastern Front. The Reds called them “Coffin for Seven Brothers”


5 posted on 09/27/2018 7:53:50 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: chief lee runamok

China’s strategic position makes truly global naval power an expensive and unnecessary ambition. Instead, China seems likely to aim for a global spoiler role against the USN as a way to dissuade the US from intervention against Chinese domination of the South China Sea and other objectives in the western Pacific.


6 posted on 09/27/2018 7:57:57 AM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

T-99 Chinese mbt
M-3???


7 posted on 09/27/2018 8:02:35 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PIF

aka “Lee” and “Grant”


8 posted on 09/27/2018 8:04:44 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: chief lee runamok
Just because a nation has a naval force it doesn't mean that nation knows how to use that naval force.
China has centuries of practice and use to catch up to in order to reach the level of other nations.

An analogy, if you will...a person with a Lamborghini crashes it on their first outing.

9 posted on 09/27/2018 8:20:37 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

That clears it up ...


10 posted on 09/27/2018 10:26:53 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Most all had riveted hulls and when hit, even if not penetrated, the impact knocked the rivets loose so they spanged about inside and killed the crew just as efficiently as if they were machine-gunned. A few later ones had welded hulls.

I found it interesting that they were used up until the end of the war in the China-Burma area as the Japs tanks were so thin-skinned, they weren't a threat. Anti-tank guns were a different matter.

11 posted on 09/27/2018 11:42:14 AM PDT by Oatka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson