Posted on 09/27/2018 6:01:59 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Not at all. My comment was regarding Chris Sisszilla.
Hey Chris Lizard, just deal with it! You’re such a melting snowflake...
The things you find repulsive in Trump many millions find funny and interesting.
Nope. The deal has not happened as of yet.
The AT&T-Time Warner marriage was completed this spring soon after a federal judge approved it. But government antitrust regulators filed to have the judge's ruling overturned, setting the stage for a landmark competition case in the U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington.
.. tick .. tick .. tick ..
“I watched the Presidents press conference. It was outstanding.”
A fitting followup to his masterful speech at the UN. I’’l bet the $hit that makes up the ICC and the UN “Human Rights Commission” are left wondering who will pay for their apartments, limos and supply of goats in NYC. The only thing I wished that he’d said is: “now that 25% limit on our UN “peacekeeping expenditures” will go down an additional ten percent next year if you don’t clean up your acts.”
FU CNN. MAGA! Trump 2020!
“Snarky liberal garbage”
Yes. And petty. Juvenile.
So at what point do we classify progressives as adolescents ?
Thanks for the update. This thing is quietly dragging on.
Many months ago, I recall ATT investors not happy about the CNN factor.
As an inside investor I'm not happy. Yes, it will help my bottom line, but I do not believe it to be ethical. The monopoly angle should be enough to deter the merger. But my thought is that a content provider should not also be a content creator. The gentlemen at the top in AT&T are fairly white hat men, but that may not always be the case.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.