Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

Restaurants are not required to “protect” their customers. They handled it without resorting to police and were still able to do what they are there to do, serve food for money. I would not have a problem going there. This is not the same as the Red Hen which had a hostile owner and staff.


2 posted on 09/27/2018 1:11:33 AM PDT by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: skr

Uh, yeah, they are.


7 posted on 09/27/2018 2:11:49 AM PDT by Trailerpark Badass (There should be a whole lot more going on than throwing bleach, said one woman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: skr

Since when, though, are restaurants not in the hospitality business?


43 posted on 09/27/2018 5:00:47 AM PDT by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: skr

Sure they are — otherwise, they wouldn’t need liability insurance.


47 posted on 09/27/2018 5:09:00 AM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson