Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bgill

http://patterico.com/2018/09/23/still-more-lack-of-corroboration-for-christine-blasey-ford/

excerpt:

Meanwhile, what to make of this? The Washington Post interviewed Ford and quoted her as claiming that she was worried when Trump was elected because Kavanaugh had been mentioned as a possible replacement for Scalia. Here’s the beginning of their piece:

When Donald Trump won his upset presidential victory in 2016, Christine Blasey Ford’s thoughts quickly turned to a name most Americans had never heard of but one that had unsettled her for years: Brett M. Kavanaugh.

Kavanaugh — a judge on the prestigious U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit — was among those mentioned as a possible replacement for Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, who died in 2016. When Trump nominated Neil M. Gorsuch, Ford was relieved but still uneasy.

Just one problem: as Alex Pappas notes, Kavanaugh was not on Trump’s list when he was elected. The original list of names released in September 2016 included only these 11 people: Keith Blackwell, Charles Canady, Steven Colloton, Allison Eid, Neil Gorsuch, Raymond Gruender, Thomas Hardiman, Raymond Kethledge, Joan Larsen, Mike Lee, and Thomas Lee. Gorsuch was picked from the list and was confirmed in April 2017. In November 2017, more a year after the election, five more names were added: Amy Coney Barrett, Britt Grant, Brett Kavanaugh, Kevin Newsom, and Patrick Wyrick.

None of this means that it’s impossible that Kavanaugh was mentioned as a dark horse replacement option for Scalia somewhere. But if his name came up it was more likely to be as a discussion of why he wasn’t on the list. Take this Wall Street Journal article as an example:

That scrutiny may have doomed the chances of once-rising members of that conservative class, such as Sixth Circuit Judge Jeffrey Sutton and Judge Brett Kavanaugh of the District of Columbia Circuit, both omitted from the initial Trump lists.

This is not a silver bullet in the heart of Ford’s story, but it is another thing that makes you go “hmmmm.”


142 posted on 09/26/2018 5:12:50 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (Fair Dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: Fred Nerks

Hey, Fred.

Yeah, that’s been discussed and it’s another of the many holes in her every changing story.


143 posted on 09/26/2018 5:22:34 PM PDT by bgill (CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]

To: Fred Nerks
At the end of March 2012, the New Yorker published a column called Holding Court by Jeffrey Toobin.

And shortly thereafter, Ford makes the revelation to her husband and therapist that a federal judge had assaulted her. The person featured in the column, Brett Kavanaugh. And in the column he is referred to as the person most likely to be nominated to the Supreme Court if a Republican won the White House in 2012.

The first time she mentions the assault in thirty years is just weeks after this column was published.

150 posted on 09/26/2018 5:42:40 PM PDT by Repealthe17thAmendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson