Quote: “Trump and the Republicans would do well to conduct their own investigation. 3 is the magic number.”
Huh!?! This affidavit is full of holes.
First, it isn’t even an “affidavit.” It isn’t “sworn” before anyone or under any law that is identified in the affidavit. It isn’t submitted under penalty of perjury. It was a publication that a lawyer put out that could have been a paper back novel.
It identifies a victim who is not alleging she is the victim of anything that Kavanaugh did.
It does not specify any specific event and gives a range of years where the non-crime (as pertains to Kavanaugh) took place.
It says that other witnesses who have told her something but does not identify who those people are and where they can be found. In other words, it erases the mistake Ford made by ensuring that witnesses could not be interviewed to refute the allegation.
The accuser (at least according to her bio) would not likely have been in high school while Kavanaugh was. What was she doing hanging out with underage kids.
I could go on but do I really have to? Lord, this is so Soviet that right about now the old Soviets must be wondering if they actually lost the Cold War.
“It was a publication that a lawyer put out that could have been a paper back novel.”
—
A badly written paperback, at that.
Get her to submit and swear to it under penalty. Not that it would make it true, but otherwise it’s meaningless.
This “sworn declaration” was submitted to the committee.
It is covered by perjury law and several other statutes.
So, whether you choose to call it an affidavit, deposition or declaration, it’s covered by the same penalties.
This woman is exposed to the full force of Federal Law.
Become aware.