[hardspunned]

The difference between this lying tramp and the Clintons, she would be under oath and penalty of perjury. She can testify to what can be proved which is a big nothing or lie under oath. The only way she shows is saying nothing but crying trying to garner sympathy.

[M. Thatcher]

The difference between this lying tramp and the Clintons, she would be under oath and penalty of perjury. She can testify to what can be proved which is a big nothing or lie under oath.

Did you know that Anita Hill's testimony contradicted what she told the FBI?

NOTHING happened to her.

[MayflowerMadam]

“she would be under oath and penalty of perjury.”

Will she for sure be put under oath?