Posted on 09/25/2018 6:22:33 PM PDT by mdittmar
I’ll never understand why Illinois keeps re-electing Whip Dick ::head shake::
I don’t know anyone who ever claimed that people are.
Idiot.
“My name is DICK and I’m a professional Projectionist.”
wow, there goes my seat on the court thanx dick
the fBI has a responsibility to do backgrounds on judicial and other nominations,.
Right you are, Dick. Oh, and NO ONE is entitled to the Oval Office, either.
She lost. GET OVER IT!!!
The SCOTUS isn’t entitled to all of the pantheonic powers it has usurped or unvented. President Trump should expand it size to 500 nonlawyer justices, about the size of the legislature it is replacing.
nor president... even if it was her turn.
LOL!
No on is entitled to an FBI investigation!
So Durbin agrees that Merritt Garland was not entitled to a seat on the U.S. Supreme Court?
Judge Brett Kavanaugh has had 5 or 6 FBI background checks for previous appointments and nothing was found. He surely had a major background check this time also. An FIB investigation of a supposed crime 30 years ago is what I took the democrats to be requesting. A sexual assault classification of a crime nowadays may not have have been a crime 30 years ago anyway I suspect a statute of limitations would have run out.
dick doesn’t think,just reads stuff given to him.
Sure, nobody is entitled to a Supreme Court seat, but the voters are entitled to have their will enacted by their rightfully elected representative, and Durbin and his communist buddies are attempting to thwart that will.
Then all the more reason for Ginsburg to get her ass out of her seat.
Dick, no one is entitled to be stupid, either, but you have succeeded immensely in doing that.
“Durbin: No One Is Entitled To A Seat On The Supreme Court”
But what if they identify as a transgender SC justice? Are they entitled . . . at least to a SC participation trophy?
I am not supporting the supposed victim. Grassley has to walk fine line to support “victims” when an allegation is made on a judicial nominee who has 6 investigations, the allegation would be the 7th. In this case they may have found insufficient information. I came her to say the original comment is false. The FBI does plenty of investigations which are not base don federal law violations, every time adjudge is nominated or allegations are made against them.. that is my only point. if you can refute that then s\cite your information otherwise accept what process grassley has been using.
No one is entitled to a senate seat. If your state weren’t so far gone, you would be.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.