Mind blowing of how selective climate change is at picking which spots to heat up more than others.
I almost posted this yesterday but didn’t want to ruin you run about Goebels warming.
National parks suck
Stopped reading right there.
These and other severe outcomes are projected to be coming to Americas 417 national parks, monuments and preserves, if the worst impacts of climate change are not staved off by massive reductions in greenhouse gases, according a new study from researchers at the University of California, Berkeley and the University of Wisconsin.
...
I wonder what kind of career an honest person could have at either place?
[Temperatures have gone up in U.S. national parks twice as fast as in the rest of the country. And it’s going to get worse, a new study finds.]
Beyond idiocy. They’ll say anything for money.
We’ve camped, hiked, climbed and rafted many of our national parks.
Two things effect change on them:
1) Natural events, over which we have no control.
2) Stupid, ignorant, brainless government decisions - typically made in Washington D.C.
....and its sister contaminants under control.]
The goalposts have been moved yet again.
We have a federal bird reserve here and they have signs out “educating” all who read how the rising seas will destroy the ecosystem. The Federal environMENTALists at the center spew their psuedo-science and have great eye rolls full of disgust for anyone who differs in their climate religion.
Tomorrow I’m going there with a cup of ice. I’ll let it sit awhile, come back and start asking those folks who drank the cup of ice because there is less in the cup. Then again, I like walking there, I don’t want to be kicked out for lambasting their facts by consensus.
I blame illegals. For the good of planet earth send them back from wince they came!
“Temperatures have gone up in U.S. national parks twice as fast as in the rest of the country”
Two times zero is what?
China continues to increase output at an alarming rate, while the EU and US reduce output... and the Left pretends that we are the problem.
The best I can tell this was published in a garbage online journal.
http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aade09/meta
Bullshit
Does this story offer any guidance on what may become of the
Wisconsin Glaciation National Park and specifically the half mile plus thick glacier that covers Chicago?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wisconsin_glaciation
Globull warming
And sea levels have risen 2" in floriduh, 4" in new york, -2" in England...
Like water seeking its level, so does/will temperature.
National Parks are another government idea gone bad. Pot growers in the parks are causing more damage than climate change.
***Montanas Glacier National Park could even find itself glacier-less.***
According to a 1942 MGM Traveltalks short on Glacier and Waterton NPs, the glaciers have been receding since the last Ice Age 12,000 years ago and “If there is NO CLIMATIC CHANGE, they will be gone in a thousand years.”
So, go-bull warming or not they will be gone.
YAWN ,go away