9fan
Some thoughts from Paul Mirengoff over at Powerline:
First, Ramirez says she was completely inebriated when the misconduct supposedly occurred.
Second, she told the New Yorker she wasnt certain what happened until after six days of talking with her attorney a former elected Democrat. According to Farrow and Mayer, in her initial conversations with The New Yorker, [Ramirez] was reluctant to characterize Kavanaughs role in the alleged incident with certainty. But one can do plenty of brain washing in six days.
Weve all heard of the MeToo movement. Now we have the MeToo, My Democrat Attorney Thinks movement.
Third, Ramirez doesnt even claim she saw Kavanaugh do anything; only that someone yelled out that Brett had done something.
Fourth, none of the other dozen people the New Yorker contacted said that Kavanaugh was even at the party where the misconduct allegedly occurred, let alone that misconduct actually occurred.
Fifth, multiple other students went on the record disputing that this happened.
We have to understand something. Democrats / leftists are ruthless. They will always be able to get lots of them to make up or wildly exaggerate stories. They are not innocent people they are thugs.
Unless you insist that evidence standards apply, and that yes women can lie (shudder) we will lose this country.
If women are always to be believed, what was Martha Stewart doing in prison for “lying”?