About the supposed incident, no. And we may never find out what happened or didn't happen.
I was talking about all the "drunken slut" background stuff which seems to be based on some very questionable anonymous sources.
Maybe it's all true. Maybe it isn't. Probably the truth is somewhere in between.
When people cite sources that aren't trustworthy they don't make a convincing case.
x, you may operate on the basis that the truth probably lies somewhere in between. Here’s my operating principle: presumption of innocence. I’m a due process guy.
Regarding whether the accuser was at an alcohol party at a home where the parents were not present when she was age 15, I agree with you, her recovered memory could be a total fabrication.