I have not had time to watch or care about this story, but one look at Kavanaugh and all I saw was
“Deep State Globalist Bush Plant To Give Them An Impeachment Vote Against Trump”.
Has ANYONE vetted this person, I mean conservatives, and not RINOs... has anyone really vetted this guy according to how we should be thinking, post-John Roberts?
Just because Trump is for Kavanuagh means nothing in this regard.And just because the Democrats are against Kavanugh does not mean he's been vetted.
John Roberts/Obamacare revealed the Uniparty works in collusion on these "left vs Right" Hegelian circuses... i.e. paid fronts/paid scandal actors.
I think Kavanaugh will be another Roberts. He’s the most conservative judge with a chance of getting approved, but he’s a middle of the road consensus builder - like Roberts. Of course, it could be what he is going through now will enlighten him on what the country is facing.
You took one look and made a judgment? Whatever that means. Why don’t you pay attention and vet him yourself? On the other hand, why vet him if you have already made your mind up?
What you have said i have thought.
Especially, since he was Romney’s choice.
I can’t remember did the left put up a huge battle when Roberts was up?
I don’t think the Dems would be
fighting this nomination as hard
as they are if Kavanaugh was a
squish. They are truly terrified
of the thought of him being on
the bench.
“Deep State Globalist Bush Plant To Give Them An Impeachment Vote Against Trump”.>>. when i saw the high school yearbook of the girls high school with drunken keg parties through out, i then included kavanaugh and all the the suburban ilk as part of the swamp and corruption in DC. The swamp is very large there.
I do not trust him. According to my research, he is in the SES - like Sessions, Rosenstein, Mueller, Horowitz, Huber, et al, were/are. That is Deep State Central.
Having said that, I would take him over any communist abortionist who sees the court as a fiat factory.
And I absolutely deplore the way the RINOs are again allowing their masters (DemoKKKrats) to dictate terms while ostensibly out of power.
In my lifetime, going back to Earl Warren, apparently there has been no real way to ensure that a SCOTUS nominee will perform on the court as expected. One can only choose based upon past performance. Perhaps the Swamp gets to some, but there are others that have not disappointed - e.g. Scalia, Thomas.
The most hopeful sign that he is not another "Deep State Bush Stooge" is that he wasn't appointed by Bush, whom apparently was ALWAYS a Deep Stater.