[DJ MacWoW]

I didn’t see Whelan suggest that Mr Garrett assaulted Blasey Ford. Quite frankly I believe she made that up but I do believe that she may have been the main attraction at a party.

[Know et al]

When B J Clinton was impeached, they denied and denied that he was guilty. Then, when the blue dress was proffered, the democrats stood by B J and backed him one hundred percent.

They began to harp that his lying under oath, his engaging in an immoral act with an intern did not rise to the level of him being unfit to be CIC.

They screamed that it was about sex. It was about sex even though it was recent sex; actual sex. B J was not removed from office.

Now, years later a woman accuses a nominee to the USSC without any evidence other than her accusation. She has no eye witnesses. No proof has been proffered.
Now the democrats are screeching that Brett Kavanaugh is guilty with evidence based on an unsubstantiated accusation. They declare he is not fit to be seated on the USSC. There was no accusation of rape or sex of any type, yet the left wants BK’s head on a pike.

Any person that can't see the hypocrisy here has got to be as blind as a bat. Even the SJWs know it but I don't expect to see them admit it.

Since when did the burden of proof fall on the accused? Until I see some solid proof beyond a reasonable doubt, I consider Brett Kavanaugh innocent of the accusation. JMHO

[RegulatorCountry]

Such girls used to be called “party favors” and I’l say she not only knew why she was there but enjoyed it. To now try and make political hay out of behavior she herself likely encouraged herself is contemptible. She is a liar and propagandist attempting to derail the career of a man simply due to opposing his politics, nothing more, nothing less.