There was a lot of evidence they were going to do it to Strange. All you had to do is talk to some of the Alabama freepers that were discussing the topic at the time. They didn't pick strange because the news was all over Alabama that Strange had done a corrupt deal to get that Senate seat.
Do you know what evidence they had that Moore was going to get hammered by lying accusations? NONE!
and I’m not impressed that you may have committed a felony.
I doubt it would have been regarded as a felony. It would have probably just been a pretty large fine if they could have proven what the defeated candidate was alleging, and I happen to know for a fact that they couldn't have proven it because what the sore loser claimed didn't happen.
But the point is, *I* took some risks, and made stuff happen. I spent a lot of money and time doing what I did, and it was successful.
Had I been in Alabama I would have worked hard to try to overcome the unfair advantage the media weapon had over the public. I wouldn't have blamed the candidate for unprovable accusations leveled against him. That is a d*ck move.
you’re doing it again. there’s always someone that’s corrupt, always some sinister deal, always some master conspiracy standing between you and your nirvana of a world ruled by the roy moores, todd akins, richard mourdocks, christine o’donnells, and steve bannons of the world.
and every time you lose, and you almost always do, you grow another conspiracy. this really is textbook clinical behavior.