Water DOES curve. See “Water suspended in weightless environment”
Liquids form globules, and once the inertial forces of expressing water into the weightless environment are dissipated by molecular friction, the water indeed forms spheres.
I’ve sailed from the Arctic to the Antarctic and crossed the Date Line and Equator in the space of one year. I’ve also gone West from Seattle and crashed eventually into New York too.
It’s round. Buy a drone, go straight up, and then look at the horizon. It’s not an optical illusion (though nautical twighlight is an illusion).
You’re saying the plane is stationary. Galileo disagrees with you, as does Copernicus, as does every other experiment that depends upon the Earth being an oblate spheroid.
I can, and have, bounced a laser off of the moon, which has a purpose built reflector placed there by men who landed there.
We clearly have the technology to prove a flat earth. Why hasn’t it happened?
RinaseaofDs,
We clearly have the technology to prove a flat earth.
It is called the Robotham Experiment.
Look. Up. The. Robotham. Experiment.
It proves that water DOES NOT curve over a six (6) mile path.
I am NOT talking about surface tension.
Galileo and Copernicus were FreeMasons. They are liars. Look it up.
Yes. You can circumnavigate the Earth. (Think of an ant following a groove in a phonograph record for one revolution.)
That DOES NOT prove a globe. That DOES NOT prove an “oblate spheroid.”