Gerbil Warming.
BS.........
It’s not nice to f*ck with Mother Nature.....
Yeah and take away rich folks beach front property?-)
It’s all insane lib BS....
Just follow the money trail....that’s what they’re really after; the legalized theft of billions of dollars to fill their coffers...and their pockets. The SOBs need to be locked up in an asylum to Make America Safe Again.....MASA!!!!
Maybe they can relocate a few volcanoes. Earthquakes and hurricanes while at it.
File it under problems that will take care of themselves.
Yes , this is total baloney. There is absolutely, unequivocally, zero global warming. none. In fact the Antarctic ice shelf grew enormously last year and it was real cold where I live.
if action is not taken to protect them..
—
The Erf is a living breathing planet and sometimes the stench from the Left becomes so oppressive, they lose their very minds. The Erf has been taking care of business for billions of years, it will do just fine after the last lib is eaten up by it.
Well then, those wetlands should rent a U-Haul and move.
I suppose they believe Nature is no longer capable of moving wetlands inland all by herself, as she has for millenia previously, without their expert meddling.
The opposite of coastal westlands moving inland, is the return of more coastal areas to the wetlands they used to be before excessive and expensive (constant damage and replacement) of human habitation encroached on them.
Taxes should not support rebuilding human habitation areas on the coasts, zoning should not encourage that development and private insurance on such areas should increase greatly, to gradually reverse development trends on the coasts.
In time those things should have the same affect - increasing coastal wetlands, as articially increasing wetlands in the interiors adjacent to the coasts, which will require even more government intervention and regulation than just outlined.
Now then, it does not take “climate change” or concern for any unpredictable amout of “sea rise” to suggest these changes.
The constant history of the sea coast damages and rebuilding and all the related costs can support the changes outlined above, “global warming” or not.
The American natives living near the Atlantic coasts were smarter. They fished the ocean but they did not live on the coasts. The kept the buffer of the trees and wetlands of the coasts protecting their villages planted inland away from the coasts. They knew the history, the constant history of storms arriving along the coast, in any season. They admitted the history and sought to protect what they had instead of allowing it to be constantly destroyed, just so they could live on the coast. You say they were poor because they didn’t have inurance or a giant government taxing enterprise? No, those things are not free and too much of the burden falls on those who do not even live there.
You say “tornadoes” and earthquakes cause damages too, damages as bad as Atlantic coastal storms and hurricanes? Nothing beats the latter in terms of the consistency and amount of damages incurred over time, when the constant damages over time are looked at collectively.
How can wetlands move? Do they call Mayflower Van Lines?