Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mac_truck

I thought for criminal cases it had to be unanimous?

****

Six months after a jury convicted Horner in a verdict that was not unanimous,


3 posted on 09/11/2018 8:44:33 AM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: 2banana

That does raise a question . . . or more. Different rules for white, heterosexual men, maybe? Oregon? A reverse Sharia rule that the testimony of a man is worth only half that of a woman? Inquiring minds would like to know.


6 posted on 09/11/2018 8:49:07 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (ObaMao: Fake America, Fake Messiah, Fake Black man. How many fakes can you fit into one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: 2banana

I was wondering the exact same thing. Bad reporting? Weird laws in Oregon? I don’t know!


8 posted on 09/11/2018 8:52:23 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: 2banana

I thought for criminal cases it had to be unanimous?

I thought so too.


25 posted on 09/11/2018 9:50:14 AM PDT by Flick Lives
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: 2banana; Vigilanteman; FreedomPoster; Flick Lives

The verdict has to be unanimous in federal criminal prosecutions; verdicts with less than unanimity (such as 9 out of 12) in state prosecutions have been found not to violate the 5th or 6th Amendments as incorporated against the states.


35 posted on 09/11/2018 11:09:13 AM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll defend your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson