To: dragnet2
You asked if the rightful tenant had "attacked" the armed intruder. I explained to you that the rightful tenant could only be considered to have been defending himself. The armed intruder was the one attacking.
That's not splitting hairs. Words mean things. "Attack" and "defend" are not the same thing. One who attacks cannot claim a right to self defense when the victim of the attack employs defensive force.
152 posted on
09/11/2018 11:03:41 AM PDT by
NorthMountain
(... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
To: NorthMountain
Are you employed at the dial an argument call center?
They were rhetorical questions slick. Clearly the victim wasn’t armed or the Dallas cops would have broadcasted that far and wide from day one.
I suggest you find an issue.
153 posted on
09/11/2018 11:10:33 AM PDT by
dragnet2
(Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson