In the wake of the unsourced NYT " anonymous" propaganda hit on our President, we now see a blatant unsourced and unsubstantiated propaganda piece intended to coax The U.S. into war with Syria/ Russia/ Iran. This one was predicted. What evidence is there of Assad's "order" to use Chlorine gas on the civilians of Syria? The answer is zero evidence exists particularly in light that there was NO finding that Assad EVER used Chlorine, sarin or any chemical weapons on his own people. There would be no strategic or military reason to do so. Let me tell you what is happening in Syria. Isis and Rebel forces trying to overthrow the Assad government and establish a caliphate have been driven into Idlib Province as a last stand. THEY hide among the population. THEY are responsible for any blood bath. Syria is not responsible for the bloodbath . They are going to remove the last vestige of Isis and rebels just like WE did with the Iraqis in Mosul just a few short months ago!! We killed THOUSANDS of civilians used as human shields by ISIS but there we properly blamed Isis for hiding among the people. What is the difference here? I want to address the strategy that I see which is now driven by the NEOCON faction of the republican party and why on Fox news. John Bolton, Karl Rove. Ambassador Haley and many others there are NEO CONS. They have all worked at Fox News ( except Haley) which in the main is the old GOP establishment, as we all know. They were instrumental in the Iraq debacle using the same tactics to cause our intervention in the middle east then as you see right now. FALSE PRETENSE. They are hell bent to take our lives and our trillions more dollars to accomplish their agenda in the Middle East. The President has great instincts and has thwarted them with intentional feckless military responses , bombing and empty runway and sending 107 cruise missiles to hit two old dilapidated abandoned buildings. ( killing no one). But he is being used by the NEO CONS and it is very dangerous. Trump knows we should not be in Syria with troops. It is a blatant violation of international law. He said we were getting "OUT". That apparently was a promise unkept. The key here is to carefully isolate and hold up for ridicule raw propaganda which has no evidence to support the alleged facts. Never rely on thing like appear in this propaganda piece, "a report on Sunday said." That is laughable. WHAT "REPORT" ? What is the evidence behind the "report" ? Where do we find the "report"? The "source" is "the report" ? Are you kidding us? We have no business in Syria. None.
1 posted on
09/10/2018 7:45:35 AM PDT by
raiderboy
To: raiderboy
Sounds like a MAD Magazine Spy v Spy v Spy situation wrt who’s telling the truth about chemical weapons. Again.
2 posted on
09/10/2018 7:48:13 AM PDT by
Paladin2
To: raiderboy
7 posted on
09/10/2018 8:22:45 AM PDT by
Texas Fossil
((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
To: raiderboy
If we attack Syria tomorrow in defense of Al Qaeda, it would be meaningful as it’s 9/11. I’m sure the NeoCons & Al Zawahiri would appreciate this.
To: raiderboy
Oh Crap! I though these FALSE FLAG incidents triggering mindless American interventions had died and were buried with McCain. I see the Globalists are using their media (the WSJ in this case) to do their modus operandi shaping of the propaganda battlefield. As we speak the Islamists in Idlib Province are probably concentrating some captive Kurd and Christian families to gas with chlorine.
10 posted on
09/10/2018 8:42:07 AM PDT by
House Atreides
(BOYCOTT the NFL, its products and players 100% - PERMANENTLY)
To: raiderboy
To: raiderboy
“a report on Sunday said”
i never read past statements like that nor comment further, because it’s pointless to take rumors seriously ...
16 posted on
09/10/2018 12:20:33 PM PDT by
catnipman
((Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson