Posted on 09/09/2018 5:04:38 PM PDT by jazusamo
She is careful with her money.
She is not interested in government handouts.
They were paid in advance, while waiting in line to get into the Senate gallery.
It simply is not true. The rich only stay rich with government help. Otherwise the first generation makes the money, the second generation keeps the money, and the third generation spends the money. It is happening with the Kennedys. It happens with most wealthy families. Only a few families manage to keep wealth for more than three generations.
Hope they are getting $1,000 cash bonds from the Soros/Steyer hirelings.
I didn’t say anything about government help. I said regardless who is in the Oval Office.
There is a difference.
Won’t have to motivate me to turn out to vote.
Not in this election, or the coming one.
We need to give dominance to President Trump
in the House and Senate, then let’s see what
he really can do for all Americans.
Trump 2020
Bump!
MAGA
You are painting with a broad brush there. Inheriting wealth is not "government help" if that's what you are implying. Taxing gains less than taxing income is not "government help" if that's what you are implying.
Actually what are you implying?
I think it’s female lawyers in black dresses with “doily” collars, dozing through the proceedings.
Can someone point to a Senate Rule that forbids the Committee from installing 1” thick Lexan between the gallery and the proceedings?
Let them scream and holler all they want in a big Cone of Silence
” ‘We will not be silenced and you need to be as outraged as we are,’”
Mam, your outrage is your own problem and is irrelevant to me and mine.
I’ve seen that first hand with my ex and her family.
only 2 out of 7 grandkids actually worked their whole life, instead of just waiting for someone to die.
My ex has spent almost a half million in a year and a half after being pretty much homeless several times since we divorced instead of just getting a damned job.
They should all be given FEDERAL FELONY disturbing the peace. No more voting or firearms for all.
demoncrat 1968 convention redux...
I am saying that later generations lack the drive to acquire status and wealth. For them to stay wealthy requires some form of assistance from the government. In England, it was primogeniture and inherited political power.
In the Americas, that has not been the case. Look at the Kennedy family. It even happens with politics. Do you expect Chealsey Clinton to keep or dissipate the fortune her parents accumulated through political power?
The families that generated great wealth in the 1900's are dissipating that wealth.
New rich in the digital age have taken their place.
Yeah but the bigger story was that Alex Jones bullied Little Marco and as a result Jones got a lifetime ban from Twitter. Nevermind the fact that Marco was the who approached Jones who was giving an interview in front of the cameras.
I bet every paid anarchist and the people who paid them to disrupt the hearings are welcome on Twitter.
Useful idiots doing the jobs the DNC refuses to do for itself.
That's Zina Bash. I wouldn't expect she'd agree with RBG on much of anything.
Ok, but inherited wealth is a somewhat narrower case. In that case you are right the “rich” almost always get poorer. But your friend needs to made aware that the rich usually do not become rich from government (or Trump’s) help, they become rich despite the government hurdles in the their way.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.