There is no so-called unlimited right to anything. In the comstitution or anywhere else.
Perhaps he should have countered her incorrect premise directly.
Why is there no “unlimited” right? Who can place restrictions? Can we trust that person or organization with placing those restrictions?
Some would say “honor killings” are a religious act. Will there come a time when they are justified?
Or that WRITTEN Constitutional Rights (i.e. in the document itself) supersedes “Court made ‘rights’” in the case of conflict
Hirono is an ignorant ass, especially if she wants to believe that abortion “rights” takes precedent over religious freedom.
It shows her own bigotry against people of faith. And that makes her incompetent to serve in that “great deliberative body”
IMPEACH HIRONO !!