This has been out there. Sounds like he’s just stating fact. There have been several questions to him where the majority opinion went against precedent law, and HE took the side of precedent.
I don’t see where he’s saying either way on how he’d vote.
They are trying to nail him for just stating a fact. He’s on the record for saying he considers Roe settled law. But it is a fact the Supreme Court can reverse a previous decision. Those two statements are not inconsistent. Getting Roe back to the SC would be a monumental effort and it would require a new argument from a new angle.
But of course, liberal-heads-exploding.