To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...
That's how it works -- Twitter can ban anyone it wants, but the President (or any other Twitter user) can't block anyone from his feed. That's what's known as Net Neutrality. Oh, and you fuddie-duddies, you shut yhour mouths about "freedom of speech", the debate is over.
27 posted on
09/04/2018 2:01:16 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
To: SunkenCiv
Oh, and you fuddie-duddies, you shut yhour mouths about "freedom of speech", the debate is over.
Why would a private company have any part of freedom of speech? The 1st amendment does not apply to private entities.
To: SunkenCiv; Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; 2ndDivisionVet; ...
29 posted on
09/04/2018 2:06:14 PM PDT by
bitt
(We know not what course others may take, but as for me, Give me Liberty, or Give me Death!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson