To: Helicondelta; All
7 posted on
09/04/2018 4:52:33 AM PDT by
Hotlanta Mike
("itYou can avoid reality, but you can't avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.")
To: Hotlanta Mike
"So, lets lay it out: In September 2016, the FBI used an informant in an attempt to ensnare Papadopoulos and establish collusion between the Trump campaign and Russias hacking of the DNC emails. Then in January 2017, after Papadopoulos confirmed Mifsud was the source of his claim that the Russians had dirt on Hillary, and had agreed to cooperate and contact Mifsud, and after the FBI located Mifsud in D.C., the FBI didnt use Papadopoulos to ensnare the supposed Russian-agent whose purported foreknowledge of the hack justified the launch of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation." Mifsud allegedly denied Papadop's version of the story. Mifsud could be western intelligence, could be a patsy, could be a Russian agent (very unlikely). Also remember that Papadop was and is naive. His alleged blabbing about Mifsud's promise dirt on Hillary was made to this guy:
(the guy on the left). That and that alone was enough for Strzok to start illegally monitoring the opposition campaign (illegal because he didn't get his rubber stamp warrant until months later)
9 posted on
09/04/2018 5:24:10 AM PDT by
palmer
(...if we do not have strong families and strong values, then we will be weak and we will not survive)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson