Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/03/2018 1:59:10 AM PDT by JonnyFive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Clinton adherent opining on a Disney media property... whatever.


2 posted on 09/03/2018 2:01:53 AM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JonnyFive

Trial by media? I miss the rule of law.


3 posted on 09/03/2018 2:05:31 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JonnyFive

And, as planned from the start, the charge will be issued one week before the midterms.


4 posted on 09/03/2018 2:07:08 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Liberals, piss off. That is all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JonnyFive

Hilarious Leon... Absolutely hilarious.


5 posted on 09/03/2018 2:11:42 AM PDT by Bullish (My tagline is here. you just can't see it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JonnyFive

Panetta is full of crap. I’m reading his autobiography and noticed that he conveniently left out that one of the most, if not the most influential political figure in his life was Hugh DeLacey, a former California US Representative and longtime member of the Communist Party USA.

Panetta is a perfect example of a “conflicted” person/personality, wanting to seem to be the protecting angel on some things, and the devil destroyer on others.

In other words, he can’t decide who he is and when that happens, he goes to his “Left” persona, which is more often than not.

Take what he says with a grain of salt.


6 posted on 09/03/2018 2:16:25 AM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JonnyFive

Panetta cites “the dismissal of those involved in the investigation” as grounds for an indictment of Trump for obstruction of justice.
Riiggghht, Leon.
That IS grounds for an indictment, not just for obstruction —but destruction—of justice.
But it should be against Mueller, not Trump!


7 posted on 09/03/2018 2:19:54 AM PDT by milagro (There is no peace in appeasement!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JonnyFive

What is that saying? Close is only good in horse shoes and hand grenades.

The leftists are desperate to use lawfare against a duly elected President to get their way. We must fight back!

Please vote in November!

JoMa


8 posted on 09/03/2018 2:22:24 AM PDT by joma89
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JonnyFive

The fact that Mueller is still wasting taxpayer dollars on this Democrat wet dream proves that President Trump isn’t.


9 posted on 09/03/2018 2:27:44 AM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JonnyFive

Leon Fakenews Panetta


10 posted on 09/03/2018 2:48:24 AM PDT by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JonnyFive
Sunday on ABC’s “This Week,” former CIA director Leon Panetta said special counsel Robert Mueller was “getting very close to making a case for obstruction of justice” against President Donald Trump.

Get rid of them all! Panetta and his ilk have zero credibility.

This is nothing but an Obama-inspired Communist style show trial! Enough!

Mueller's gangsters are trying to pick fly poop out of pepper, while wallowing in tons of their own excrement. How can they ignore their own stench?

11 posted on 09/03/2018 2:51:30 AM PDT by olezip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JonnyFive

This has basically become the Democrats’ Great Pumpkin. President Trump has been a week away from indictment/impeachment for like 1.5 years now.


13 posted on 09/03/2018 3:07:59 AM PDT by Trump20162020
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JonnyFive

Psssst I m hunkering a wabbit...


14 posted on 09/03/2018 3:08:38 AM PDT by knighthawk (We will always remember We will always be proud We will always be prepared so we may always be free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JonnyFive

The coup plotters march on. November 6, the ballot box. November 7th, will it be the ammunition box?


16 posted on 09/03/2018 3:23:34 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JonnyFive

It’s to bad Mueller isn’t playing horseshoes.


17 posted on 09/03/2018 3:24:26 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (The stone age didn't end because we ran out of stones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JonnyFive

Barbara Streisand.


19 posted on 09/03/2018 3:26:27 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JonnyFive

Obstruction of justice? You can’t have obstruction when there is no justice.


20 posted on 09/03/2018 3:33:15 AM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners. And to the NSA trolls, FU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JonnyFive

There can be no obstruction when no crime has taken place. And I’m fairly certain that winning an election while not being a member of the elite political class is not a crime.


21 posted on 09/03/2018 3:48:18 AM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JonnyFive

What Panetta claims is obstruction of justice is not obstruction of justice. Firing Comey is not obstruction of justice - he deserved to be fired straight out of the gate for incompetence, and it is beyond clear there were numerous other reasons singularly that he should have been fired, and the President had absolute Constitutional authority to do so. Moreover, there is no logic in saying Mueller is now “close to making a case” for facts known long before the investigation even began. And laughably, Panetta also claims that Trump verbally attacking the case as a witch hunt and Giuliani attacking the credibility of the investigation is also grounds for obstruction of justice charges. That’s plain stupid to begin with (especially since he was part of the Clinton administration - remember what they said about Kenneth Starr they were completely making up?), not to mention due to the revelations revealed in the Grassley memo, Nunes memo, FISA application, IG reports, released e-mails from Ohr, Fusion GPS, etc. which were the basis for the attacks on the credibility of the investigation, not to mention also the team Mueller has put together - and so many other things that have been revealed about the bogus origins of this investigation. Of course Martha Raddatz didn’t bother bring any of this up in the discussion. “Do you have concerns that the Trump team can undermine this investigation even before it’s finished?” was literally one of her questions. Does she really think all of that information revealed above and more doesn’t undermine the investigation?

Deliberately misleading viewers...again.


22 posted on 09/03/2018 3:55:53 AM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JonnyFive; bitt

So Mueller made up the Russia collusion story to try and trick the President into obstruction of justice in the future?

Sounds like conspiracy to overthrow our government.


23 posted on 09/03/2018 4:01:30 AM PDT by Brown Deer (America First!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JonnyFive

The PINHEAD speaks!!


25 posted on 09/03/2018 4:05:39 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson