[Mr. N. Wolfe]

“A judicial process that doesn’t allow the accused to cross-examine his accuser or reliably see the evidence against him is a civil libertarian’s nightmare. It traduces every principle of fairness and is blatantly un-American.”

Sounds like the FISA courts.

[Migraine]

Well, I’ll be a monkey’s uncle!

[Rebelbase]

What happens if the Universities tell DeVos to piss off?

Lose federal funds?

[AndyJackson]

What 14th Amendment right to due process and equal protection? The racists KKK democrats had the 14th amendment forced on them at gunpoint, literally.

[Rapscallion]

You always get savaged when you do the right thing. Good for her.

[wastedyears]

Schools have no constitutional right to determine whether someone is guilty of something or not.

[Calvinist_Dark_Lord]

A judicial process that doesn’t allow the accused to cross-examine his accuser or reliably see the evidence against him is a civil libertarian’s nightmare.

...and a Godsend for Civil Liberties lawyers filing charges in such a case on behalf of their clients

If the so-called "civil liberties" organisations had pressed this matter in the first place, the action by Sec. DeVoss and the Trump Administration would not be necessary.

[upchuck]

Ping.

[lurk]

A simple note denouncing a citizen is sufficient to send him to the guillotine. Sound familiar?

[rmlew]

Colleges and universities refuse to give a public racial breakdown of men expelled by these kangaroo courts, becayse Title IX is how progressives lynch African Americans in the 21st century.