Replies

WHY WOULD THEY WANT TO HIDE THEM?

There is no reason science is hidden unless you have something to hide.

ALL Scientific studies that are worth a darn are subject to ‘peer-review’.

These people have already admitted to the single most cardinal sin in science.

There are many levels of bad science.

The first is when you get data, analyze it, and come to the wrong conclusions. That’s FINE and to be expected, and why peer review is so important. Someone else may see something you missed.

The next is getting data and DELIBERATELY ignoring it to show only the results you want. This happens when they have a result they want in their head, and are blinded or choose to see something else. This is also discoverable in peer-review when someone else looks at the data.

But the absolute WORST thing you can do is get data, delete anything that does not agree with what you want. You cannot go back and look at the data and fix anything in peer-review. Money was wasted and the entire study needs to be done again.

This is what these alleged ‘scientists’ have already admitted to.

This should be cause for immediate termination and never being hired to do any science again. This is why they don’t want their emails to be seen. The contents were already leaked, and we know what they say. They admit to deleting stuff that did not ‘prove’ climate change.

They need to hide their manipulations of the "science" to get the desired results. That's not science that's politics. The whole issue has been fraudulent right from the start. The first IPCC report, back in 1988 iirc, was very dubious of finding any man made effect. It was altered by partisans, after it had been reviewed and approved for publication, to suggest the opposite. This has been documented by skeptics and other ethical researchers with access to the inside story.