Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LS
The idea is not without its trade-offs.

If the primary winner accepts the appointment, she will be trading a sure two years in the Senate for a chance at eight years but with all the fundraising and campaigning that goes with it. She will have to run again as an incumbent in 2020 to finish the term, and again in 2022 for the chance at a full six years.

Since this will create a vacancy in the general election, the state Republican party will be free to select any replacement candidate that they want. While the runner-up in the primary would be nice, it doesn't have to be that person. However, it will need to be somebody with a ground organization in place, so a primary candidate would make sense.

If the primary winner would rather have the direct shot at an outright six-year term, then the voters might not see the runner-up being appointed as a slap at the winner, because that person will need to run again two more times.

-PJ

111 posted on 08/27/2018 3:00:12 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]


To: Political Junkie Too

The idea was suggested to me by an AZ person that Ducey may want the seat in 2020 and therefore wants a “temp” in it.


114 posted on 08/27/2018 6:25:44 PM PDT by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson