Muslims not only oppose abortion, they forcibly marry little girls to old perverts. They have harems. They cut the noses off rape victims if not stoning them to death for adultery. They mutilate female genitalia so the wife or concubine will not enjoy sex -- with the object of removing the incentive for infidelity. [The men, of course, are free to be unfaithful, bringing STDs to their baby mamas and unborn children.]
They not only oppose same-sex marriage, but also toss homosexuals off buildings. That is their alternative to the deprogramming offered by Christians.
Christians witness their faith; Muslims spread their violent, expansionist political ideology via deception, demographic invasion and sectarian violence.
And yet the LGBTQ activists do not try to silence Muslims. They do not deliberately target Muslim-owned business to force them with the choice of either violating their principles or be fined/litigated out of existence.
Why?
There are two reasons; one of which is obvious, while the other is not. Obviously, Leftist activists do not want to rile Muslims, because in doing so, they would put their very lives at risk. That makes them hypocrites and cowards in their selective outrage.
The less obvious reason is that they consider Muslims as Agents of Change. They are temporary allies in bringing down the existing order, so the Leftist vision of Utopia can be sown in the bones, ashes and rubble.
I am not a Christian, but recognize that the religion is one of the foundational pillars of Western Civilization. It would be very difficult to hold our society together if its influence were significantly eroded. The Left and Muslims recognize it also, so they target Christians deliberately -- because they share the same hatred for our way of life and our people.
The likes of Angela Merkel, other European Leftists and those in America want to replace Caucasians with Arabs and other Third Worlders. They want to replace Christianity with Islam.
They see their own people and culture as impediments to installing their twisted view of Utopia. They want to replace those accustomed to prosperity and freedom with people who hail from places in which corruption is the norm -- and questioning authority can be hazardous to one's health.
They know that we're being looted, raped and slaughtered by neighbors we neither asked for nor chose. They see us as collateral damage as they look down their noses at us while hiding behind armed guards in gated communities/secured buildings.
They naively think those from an alien, hostile, backward, unassimilable culture can be brought under heel by getting them addicted to social programs. In fact, we taxpayers are being forced to subsidize the demise of our nations and people.
They continue to select themselves for extinction by building more coffins than cradles and are blithely dismissive of the real threat of being demographically overwhelmed.
Only when it is their turn being buried to the waist as men bearing stones stalk toward them will they experience the consequences of their folly.
And likely even then they will still not understand.
If sodomy is normal, then Christianity has no meaning.
This believer is not deceived. I’ve been saying to my non FR friends their ultimate goal is to have the church recognize them as being normal.
Muslims are the shock troops for Marxists. Both are totalitarian, absolutist, violent, and anti-Christian; they are natural allies.
Having said that, the main problem in this cultural battle is that rightists (Christian or not) consistently allow leftists to define and control the debate.
“Gay” is a legitimate word that has been usurped from its innocent meaning to express something perverse.
“Homosexual” is an illegitimate word that is inherently nonsensical in any application.
“Gender” is a legitimate word in linguistic grammar that has been disingenuously conflated with biological sex.
Christians and conservatives foolishly yield philosophical territory to the enemy by using their deceptive terms instead of ones that express objective moral truths.
Nota Bene:
1) There is no such thing as homosexuality.
2) Sex is binary and between two sexually mature adults.
There is no functional form of human sexuality that can occur between two persons of the same sex. Likewise, there is no functional form of human sexuality that can occur between a sexually mature adult and a sexually immature child.
Thus, both homoerotic and pedophilic activity are inherently unnatural and immoral.
Sexuality is binary, and predicated upon reproduction. That determines what is inherently natural sexual activity, not the other way around! (Binary sexuality, as a means of reproduction, is the horse; erotic activity, whether licit or illicit, is the cart.)
What occurs between two persons of the same sex is an expression of eroticism, not sexuality. It is the narcissistic fetishization of another human being.
The correct term for it thus is homoeroticism.
What occurs between an adult and a child is an expression of eroticism, not sexuality. It is the exploitative corruption of an immature human being.
The correct term for it thus is pedophilia.
Fifty years ago, secular scientists mocked the idea of love, saying that sex was all and only about reproducing the species, and that love was a chemical illusion to guarantee one spreading one’s genes in the genetic pool.
Now, the humanist pseudo-scientists that have replaced the secularists insist that it is binary sex that is the illusion, and that non-binary sex is all about sharing love.
This is actually an outgrowth of Communistic Redistribution:
Equality of Opportunity says that one may marry any person of the opposite sex, of a suitable age, and of not too close a genetic relation. These preconditions are objective, and based upon reproduction as the significator of valid expression of human sexuality. They afford to every single adult homoerotic person exactly the same right and opportunity as to a heterosexual one.
Equality of Outcome says that the homoerotic person should be allowed a special privilege to have sex and marriage redefined so that he or she (or whatever ersatz pronoun) may have the same subjective love experience that a heterosexual person has in real marriage. These demands render the whole concept of legitimate erotic love a purely arbitrary one, ignoring the raison d’etre of marriage: human reproduction.
This is not about true equal rights; it is about false special rights.
Monogamous marriage did develop accidentally, produced through tradition. It existed intrinsically, and produced subsequent tradition.
Monogamy: mono + gamete. One sperm plus one ovum equals one zygote.
Like the above perversions, an erotic orgy of one woman with twenty men - an example of “polyamory” - is not in accord with Natural Law. She may indeed have sexual intercourse with any or all of them, and she may indeed conceive a child - but that child will have one father to go with its one mother, not twenty!
Humanity is Fallen. We want all sorts of sinful things. That does not make them natural or legitimate.
Satan is the ultimate deceiver.
JoMa
Totally silly title. True Christians aren’t “deceived”; they don’t buy into the crap even one little bit.