Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Slyfox

I don’t see how an SOS could function without a security clearance. They are constantly involved in security situations. Just think about Benghazi. You KNOW she had to have been all over secret info on that. And that’s just one example. In 2016, when her campaign was asked if she still had a security clearance, their reply was, “no comment”. That speaks volumes, IMHO.


87 posted on 08/26/2018 1:51:39 PM PDT by Flaming Conservative ((Pray without ceasing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]


To: Flaming Conservative
If you were working in the White House as an agent whose job was to make sure everyone had their clearance and First Lady Hillary rebuffs you time and time again, and then she makes it difficult for you to secure her assistants, who do you complain to? Especially, when she has control of the people you work for.

I think that people just "took it for granted" that she had one, because she is who she is. Later, everyone just assumes that she had a security clearance all along. Presidents don't go through clearances, only their assistants. What do you do with a First Lady?

Anyone who has a top security clearance would know that it is illegal to put secrets on your personal computer. But, she missed that lesson cuz she never went through any training.

Laws are for peons.

88 posted on 08/26/2018 2:45:25 PM PDT by Slyfox (Not my circus, not my monkeys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson