[nwrep]

I am reading That there are claims that the prosecutors now actually have this corroborating material that describes just such a purpose for making these payments that is to say, influencing the election. This is from articles that quote the Southern District of New York prosecutors.

[Lazamataz]

Please produce citations of such a thing.

Your post made me curious, so I went hunting. I found this, in Politico (who is no friend of President Trump):

But as a lawyer, Cohen could be assumed to have some familiarity with federal election law. Prosecutors may well have proof in emails or other documents that he regularly discussed compliance with such statutes.

Proving that Trump knew at the time that the payouts were intended to influence the presidential race, and that he knew they were illegal, could be much harder. Perhaps such records exist, or maybe Cohen is prepared to say that he told Trump the way they were handling it was illegal, but the lawyer never said that in court on Tuesday.

“In order to prove criminal intent, you have to point to evidence that the actors knew or had reason to know what they were doing was illegal,” said Baran, the GOP campaign finance lawyer.

In short, what this article says is, that directing these payments is not illegal. Knowing the regulations around campaign laws is not illegal. The only thing that is illegal would be a willful and purposed violation of campaign laws. That is a very high bar.

As I said, he would have to make some pretty damning admissions in a recorded media. Cohen's testimony won't cut it.

And if Donald Trump is THAT unwise, maybe he NEEDS to be impeached.