I’m not believing that some posters here are “cowards” just because they disagree with you. I think “realists” is a better way to describe them.
Anyway, let me present two scenarios.
Scenario 1.
President Trump is removed from office by a strictly Constitutional process. The House impeaches by a majority vote, and then the Senate convicts by a 2/3 vote.
I would find that disgusting. But as much as I admire Trump, I admire the Rule of Law more. I would accept that result, then work like hell to defeat those involved at the polls.
Scenario 2.
The Democrats take back the House. Then Nancy Pelosi goes on TV, backed by a number of Obama-appointed generals and FBI officials. Pelosi announces that “as the representative of the will of the people”, she has arrested Trump and taken possession of the White House.
I’m an old guy. But in that case the deer rifle comes off the mantle. And I won’t be back home for awhile.
This isn't about Trump, and certainly has NOTHING to do with "Rule of Law". Rule of Law is gone now, right now, and as long as the criminal traitors on the left are free. This is about the very survival of the Republic, and your scenarios either way would entirely negate the ballot box, leaving but one box to remedy the problem. In either scenario, or any other, be prepared. "Accepting" BS results is only aiding and abetting the enemy.
Well said, but what is most likely intended is:
Scenario 3.
President Trump is removed from office by a Beltway show trial which uses buzzwords and rhetoric from admin law, pop culture and the Constitution, but Andrey Vyshinsky levels of due process. The uniparty House impeaches by a majority vote, and then the uniparty Senate convicts by a 2/3 vote.
Willard Romney gloats, Lindsey Graham simpers, McConnell’s and Session’s mouths hang slack. Congress turns to the next order of business which is universal amnesty.
Scenario 1.
President Trump is removed from office by a strictly Constitutional process. The House impeaches by a majority vote, and then the Senate convicts by a 2/3 vote.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I would not see it as legitimate.
These same people went along with the Kenyanesian Usurpation.
Obama is NOT a natural born citizen.
We left the Constitution behind on Usurpation Day, January 20, 2009.
That you don’t recognize, at this point, that your 2 scenarios are the same thing is amazing.
>>But as much as I admire Trump, I admire the Rule of Law more.
Politicians are political. They are not jurists. What if they legally impeach him for some vague Russia collusion where he spoke to a Russian and they put up fake FB posts? There’s your Rule of Law that you eloquently hide behind. Do you love that?
I get it. You only “lean” right. I would not assume that you are in the 3% or even in the 30% that would lend assistance later. The Revolution had more Tories than Patriots.