Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ManHunter
Sure the F-111 was "good" for some things and I know Ravens did a good job because they were able to carry an effective EW package, but overall they were McNamera's "Flying Edsel".

I had a buddy who was an F-111 pilot and on several occasions he mentioned that "there had never been a successful ejection" from the F-111E (I believe). That was the model where the entire front of the aircraft was supposed to separate.

30 posted on 08/23/2018 8:25:22 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty ('DEPLORABLE' Charter Member of The Vast Right Wing Conspiracy - and DAMN Proud of it!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: The Sons of Liberty

The F-111 had lots of ejections. It had multiple aircraft with ejections while I was at Lakenheath. All of them were successful.


32 posted on 08/23/2018 8:27:27 AM PDT by CodeToad ( Hating on Trump is hating on me and America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: The Sons of Liberty

Actually, that’s not true. Here’s one reference to a successful escape module ejection:

http://www.ejectionsite.com/f111restore.htm

I flew in the FB-111 and EF-111 when I was a cadet at the Air Force Academy and the pilots I flew with loved the aircraft. Like another oft-criticized aircraft, the F-4 Phantom, the F-111 was a multi-role aircraft; it wasn’t the best at anything, but pretty damned good at a lot of things.


78 posted on 08/24/2018 5:27:48 AM PDT by ManHunter (You can run, but you'll only die tired... Army snipers: Reach out and touch someone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson