What's happening with the aforementioned sites is they are performing in-kind services in support of agenda driven political groups by attacking, defaming and deplatforming those who are not in agreement with those groups - they have discarded objectivity and aligned with and are now part of a specific political apparatus. There's been people running around this site posting stuff that it's 'their site, their rules' blah blah blah. Maybe once upon a time under normal circumstances - but these are not normal circumstances, not any more. That ship has long sailed.
Again, none of the so-called violations violate their rules. If they want to blame fraudulent reporting of violations by leftist users, isn’t that akin to “swatting” by registering false complaints? Is it enough to only restore content by Prager U that was banned or should the harasser see his own account banned?
There are attempts to monetize increased visibility, since only one side has to pay to restore their exposure, isn’t that a shakedown racket?