>>Private media platforms have every right to decide who can use them. But the platforms are wrong to shut down people with whom they disagree.
Bake the damn cake. None of their publicly stated policies are violated.
Also call the ‘fickless’ FEC as these are actions designed to influence elections by supressing something someone has to say. How much is this contribution worth to the Democrats?
Dennis Prager made an interesting point the other day. He said if these sites like Facebook, Twitter, Youtube, etc. came out and said the ONLY speech they wanted on their sites would be from the Left, well, okey dokey then (though that would be ultimately awkward for the ones that are publicly traded), but yet they continue to push the narrative that they are not suppressing any speech, are neutral and objective - which is a lie and fraud.