Posted on 08/21/2018 2:29:41 AM PDT by Rastus
This is your brain on liberalism.
Healthline is one of the most trafficked websites in the United States. As of Aug 2018, it had a global ranking by Alexa of 614 and a United States ranking of 237.
This much respected online health journal announced a major shift this week in an attempt to be more inclusive to the LGBTQIA community.
From now on “front hole” will be used on the site instead of “vagina” so that some nutcase who identifies as a teapot or a rake will feel included.
Women are reduced to front holes.
Caldronpoll.com reported:
--- Healthline has claimed health disparities and higher rates of HIV and STIs observed in LGBTQIA communities are due to discrimination in the sex ed world. So, the California based health information provider has adopted the gender-inclusive term “front hole” in place of the medical term, “vagina” in their latest LGBTQIA safe sex guide.
“For the purpose of this guide, we’ll refer to the vagina as the ‘front hole’ instead of solely using the medical term ‘vagina,’” the document explains. “This is gender-inclusive language that’s considerate of the fact that some trans people don’t identify with the labels the medical community attaches to their genitals.”
“For example, some trans and nonbinary-identified people assigned female at birth may enjoy being the receptors of penetrative sex, but experience gender dysphoria when that part of their body is referred to using a word that society and professional communities often associate with femaleness. An alternative that’s becoming increasingly popular in trans and queer communities is front hole.” ---
We were on this “new language” path in the 1990s, some of it dialed back in the early 2000s but Obama definitely set the course back on track hellbound at high speed.
And of course it will used to burn/throw out old texts from schools and libraries for using “outdated” “outmoded” terminology.
How far on this path is the rest of the West?
Are there movements in England, France, Spain, Italy, Germany, Holland, Denmark, Norway, Belgium, Portugal, Scotland, Ireland, Finland, Canada, Quebec (FR), etc to say “shim” and “front hole”?
what about the p-hole?
Fake Science
Just when you thought you had seen it all. These people are nuts!
Back-Hole Bruce is now Front Hole Caitlyn.
The old folks where I grew up used to laugh about two-holers, which apparently were fancy two seat outhouses. So, apropos I guess. Are males rear holers or is that discriminatory because front holers have a rear hole? Liberalism is hard.
Another manifestation of the Chromosome Deniers.
When someone cuts me off in traffic, would it now be appropriate to call them a "back hole"?
>>War on women comes from the left. Period. I have never in all my years seen so much collective insanity.
same time and place as the collectivist insanity of Jim Jones and Charles Manson
Charlie was in SF before heading to LA
Kate Millett author of Sexual Politics drove some of this thinking and was certifiably crazy (institutionalized in the 70s even) and her girlfriend committed suicide.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kate_Millett
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3200158/posts
Marxist Feminism’s Ruined Lives
Frontpagemag.com ^ | 9-2-2014 | Mallory Millett
...It was 1969. Kate invited me to join her for a gathering at the home of her friend, Lila Karp. They called the assemblage a “consciousness-raising-group,” a typical communist exercise, something practiced in Maoist China. We gathered at a large table as the chairperson opened the meeting with a back-and-forth recitation, like a Litany, a type of prayer done in Catholic Church. But now it was Marxism, the Church of the Left, mimicking religious practice:
“Why are we here today?” she asked.
“To make revolution,” they answered.
“What kind of revolution?” she replied.
“The Cultural Revolution,” they chanted.
“And how do we make Cultural Revolution?” she demanded.
“By destroying the American family!” they answered.
“How do we destroy the family?” she came back.
“By destroying the American Patriarch,” they cried exuberantly.
“And how do we destroy the American Patriarch?” she replied.
“By taking away his power!”
“How do we do that?”
“By destroying monogamy!” they shouted.
“How can we destroy monogamy?”
Their answer left me dumbstruck, breathless, disbelieving my ears. Was I on planet earth? Who were these people?
“By promoting promiscuity, eroticism, prostitution and homosexuality!” they resounded.
They proceeded with a long discussion on how to advance these goals by establishing The National Organization of Women. It was clear they desired nothing less than the utter deconstruction of Western society. The upshot was that the only way to do this was “to invade every American institution. Every one must be permeated with ‘The Revolution’”: The media, the educational system, universities, high schools, K-12, school boards, etc.; then, the judiciary, the legislatures, the executive branches and even the library system.
It fell on my ears as a ludicrous scheme, as if they were a band of highly imaginative children planning a Brinks robbery; a lark trumped up on a snowy night amongst a group of spoiled brats over booze and hashish.
To me, this sounded silly. I was enduring culture shock after having been cut-off from my homeland, living in Third-World countries for years with not one trip back to the United States. I was one of those people who, upon returning to American soil, fell out of the plane blubbering with ecstasy at being home in the USA. I knelt on the ground covering it with kisses. I had learned just exactly how delicious was the land of my birth and didn’t care what anyone thought because they just hadn’t seen what I had or been where I had been. I had seen factory workers and sex-slaves chained to walls.
How could they know? Asia is beyond our ken and, as they say, utterly inscrutable, and a kind of hell I never intended to revisit. I lived there, not junketed, not visited like sweet little tourists — I’d conducted households and tried to raise a child. I had outgrown the communism of my university days and was clumsily groping my way back to God.
How could twelve American women who were the most respectable types imaginable — clean and privileged graduates of esteemed institutions: Columbia, Radcliffe, Smith, Wellesley, Vassar; the uncle of one was Secretary of War under Franklin Roosevelt — plot such a thing? Most had advanced degrees and appeared cogent, bright, reasonable and good. How did these people rationally believe they could succeed with such vicious grandiosity? And why?
I dismissed it as academic-lounge air-castle-building. I continued with my new life in New York while my sister became famous publishing her books, featured on the cover of “Time Magazine.” “Time” called her “the Karl Marx of the Women’s Movement.” This was because her book laid out a course in Marxism 101 for women. Her thesis: The family is a den of slavery with the man as the Bourgeoisie and the woman and children as the Proletariat. The only hope for women’s “liberation” (communism’s favorite word for leading minions into inextricable slavery; “liberation,” and much like “collective” – please run from it, run for your life) was this new “Women’s Movement.” Her books captivated the academic classes and soon “Women’s Studies” courses were installed in colleges in a steady wave across the nation with Kate Millett books as required reading.
Imagine this: a girl of seventeen or eighteen at the kitchen table with Mom studying the syllabus for her first year of college and there’s a class called “Women’s Studies.” “Hmmm, this could be interesting,” says Mom. “Maybe you could get something out of this....”
It isn’t just Healthline, it is institutionalized.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2785444/
2010
There’s No Pamphlet for the Kind of Sex I Have: HIV-Related Risk Factors and Protective Behaviors Among Transgender Men Who Have Sex with Non-Transgender Men
(e.g., many trans men prefer the terms front sex or front hole sex to vaginal sex).
about
Building Healthy Online Communities (BHOC) is a consortium of public health leaders and gay dating website and app owners who are working together to support HIV and STI prevention online.
...Building Healthy Online Communities held a meeting with STD/HIV program directors, HIV community-based organizations, and CDC representatives on Dec. 9, 2015 to discuss next steps in prioritizing interventions and research for prevention on dating sites and apps...
Vaginal/Front-Hole Sex
https://www.bhocpartners.org/give-users-good-info/sex-ed-for-gay-men/#toggle-id-6
maybe they could call it “the breeder hole”
>>The old folks where I grew up used to laugh about two-holers, which apparently were fancy two seat outhouses.
double-decker upstairs and downstairs?!
No, just tandem. You got to share the experience.
Yes, they do come together.
Briefly.
Until the Islamics start tossing the gays off of tall buildings.
Just to add to the dystopian confusion, remember that any time a given “trans” individual is “gendered” in progressive propaganda or medical literature (but I repeat myself) it’s the gender they ain’t. So this is talking about women who have had their breasts lopped off and are taking testosterone, having sex with literal males, albeit highly confused ones.
something I saw on the british national healthcare system told people undergoing hormonal treatment to change sex that they may experience a shift in desires to the same sex as their birth sex (opposite of the sex hormones they are taking), and “don’t be concerned by this change”.
So could a number of so-called same sex desire afflicted persons find normalcy if they simply took a boost of sex hormones for their birth sex?
At the end of it all, sex positive agenda proponents don’t care why you desire to have sex with someone (science, lust, societal, etc.) they simply seek to end all moral judgments regarding sexual pairings of any kind regardless of sex, age, relation, marital status (single or adultery), number, or species of partner(s).
Kate Millett wanted to encourage homosexual experimentation (as did the Weather Underground who felt that same sex swinging in their group smashed the patriarchy and smashed monogamy). If it is genetic, how could one be compelled to “experiment”? Why is it so wrong to encourage self identified homosexuals to experiment with heterosexual encounters? Why is advocacy only permitted to encourage homosexuality (California is outlawing so called ‘conversion therapy’).
The top line unspoken agenda is population reduction. Sexual contact of any kind other than reproductive is to be encouraged. If a given psychological disorder renders one highly unlikely or even incapable of reproducing, even better. That’s what it all boils down to, invariably.
hee hee...
I’m using that
SHUT UP! I’ll base your fist with my face... asss... You broke my house. Go away, I’m baitin’!
Exactly! You’ve hit it again, Laz.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.