Wait, what? In Washington state? Sounds like the judge needs a visit from margabby kellygiffords or former mare nanny bloomers to get his attitude adjusted.
1 posted on
08/19/2018 9:32:10 AM PDT by
rktman
To: rktman
2 posted on
08/19/2018 9:32:34 AM PDT by
rktman
(Enlis ted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
To: rktman
3 posted on
08/19/2018 9:33:59 AM PDT by
GOP Poet
To: rktman
The judge didn't even need to get to the substantive issue. If the text is confusing, then it should not become law, or eligible to become law. Period. Void for vagueness is a pretty simple standard to follow.
The Left is apparently arguing that they should not even be bound by that anymore. Law is what they say it means, when they say it, no matter what they said last week.
4 posted on
08/19/2018 9:38:28 AM PDT by
Teacher317
(We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
To: rktman
Very glad to hear this, as I was worried that the bait and switch used last time to pass the “universal background check on gun transfers” would work again. At least this is a reprieve. And by the time they are able to bring this around again, I hope to be safely in Texas and away from Californicated Washington.
5 posted on
08/19/2018 9:39:06 AM PDT by
Wonder Warthog
(The Hog of Steel and NRA Life Member)
To: rktman
It’s really only King County that is the liberal land.
8 posted on
08/19/2018 9:52:42 AM PDT by
MarMema
(John James for US Senate. Dump Debbie!! Let's Fly Michigan.)
To: rktman
Kind of a TKO but I’ll take it!
15 posted on
08/19/2018 10:34:24 AM PDT by
rockrr
( Everything is different now...)
To: rktman
A judicial blind squirrel.
17 posted on
08/19/2018 10:45:27 AM PDT by
daler
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson