Posted on 08/17/2018 8:48:00 AM PDT by Kaslin
If ex-CIA Director John Brennan did to Andrew Jackson what he did to Donald Trump, he would have lost a lot more than his security clearance.
He would have been challenged to a duel and shot.
"Trump's ... performance in Helsinki," Brennan had said, "exceeds the threshold of 'high crimes & misdemeanors.' It was ... treasonous."
Why should the president not strip from a CIA director who calls him a traitor the honor and privilege of a security clearance? Or is a top-secret clearance an entitlement like Social Security?
CIA directors retain clearances because they are seen as national assets, individuals whose unique experience, knowledge and judgment may be called upon to assist a president in a national crisis.
Not so long ago, this was a bipartisan tradition.
Who trashed this tradition?
Was it not the former heads of the security agencies -- CIA, FBI, director of national intelligence -- who have been leveling the kind of savage attacks on the chief of state one might expect from antifa?
Are ex-security officials entitled to retain the high privileges of the offices they held, if they descend into cable-TV hatred and hostility?
Former CIA chief Mike Hayden, in attacking Trump for separating families of detained illegal immigrants at the border, tweeted a photo of the train tracks leading into Auschwitz.
"Other governments have separated mothers and children" was Hayden's caption. CARTOONS | Robert Ariail View Cartoon
Is that fair criticism from an ex-CIA director?
Thursday, The New York Times decried Trump's accusation that the media are "the enemy of the people."
"Insisting that truths you don't like are 'fake news' is dangerous to the lifeblood of democracy. And calling journalists 'the enemy of the people' is dangerous, period," said the Times.
Fair enough, but is it not dangerous for a free press to be using First Amendment rights to endlessly bash a president as a racist, fascist, sexist, neo-Nazi, liar, tyrant and traitor?
The message of journalists who use such terms may be to convey their detestation of Trump. But what is the message received in the sick minds of people like that leftist who tried to massacre Republican congressmen practicing for their annual softball game with Democrats?
And does Trump not have a point when he says the Boston Globe-organized national attack on him, joined in by the Times and 300 other newspapers, was journalistic "collusion" against him?
If Trump believes that CNN, MSNBC, The New York Times and The Washington Post are mortal enemies who want to see him ousted or impeached, is he wrong?
We are an irreconcilable us-against-them nation today, and given the rancor across the ideological, social and cultural chasm that divides us, it is hard to see how, even post-Trump, we can ever come together again.
Speaking at a New York LGBT gala in 2016, Hillary Clinton said: "You could put half of Trump's supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables ... racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic ... Some of those folks ... are irredeemable, but ... they are not America."
When Clinton's reflections on Middle America made it into print, she amended her remarks. Just as Gov. Andrew Cuomo rushed to amend his comments yesterday when he blurted at a bill-signing ceremony:
"We're not going to make America great again. It was never that great." America was "never that great"?
Cuomo's press secretary hastened to explain, "When the president speaks about making America great again ... he ignores the pain so many endured and that we suffered from slavery, discrimination, segregation, sexism and marginalized women's contributions."
Clinton and Cuomo committed gaffes of the kind Michael Kinsley described as the blurting out of truths the speaker believes but desperately does not want a wider audience to know.
In San Francisco in 2008, Barack Obama committed such a gaffe.
Asked why blue-collar workers in industrial towns decimated by job losses were not responding to his message, Obama trashed these folks as the unhappy losers of our emerging brave new world:
"They get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."
These clingers to their Bibles, bigotries and guns are the people the mainstream media, 10 years later, deride and dismiss as "Trump's base."
What Clinton, Cuomo and Obama spilled out reveals what is really behind the cultural and ideological wars of America today.
Most media elites accept the historic indictment -- that before the Progressives came, this country was mired in racism, sexism, homophobia and xenophobia, and that its history had been a long catalog of crimes against indigenous peoples, Africans brought here in bondage, Mexicans whose lands we stole, migrants, and women and gays who were denied equality.
The people who cheer Trump believe the country they inherited from their fathers was a great, good and glorious country, and that the media who detest Trump also despise them.
For such as these, Trump cannot scourge the media often enough.
I think about 1966 was pretty good.
Long hair and hippie lifestyle and psychedelic rock and the rest made “straights” beat up guys with long hair and then SDS and antiwar demonstrations fought the straights. Vietnam did it, of course.
The real turning point for me was black violence and feminism, so 1967 and 1972. Never back together like Humpty Dumpty.
Sedition. Naked sedition. And the previous president stokes these fires.
Of course everyone knew he was a communisty organizizer...
With Obama there is a political bloodline to the bomb throwing cop killing bank robbing riot causing actions of the Weather Underground in the 70s and 80s.
Only after the likes of Clinton and Cuomo and the RATS disappear.
No, it’s going to get much worse, and probably extremely violent, sadly
Exactly! The Valerie/Obama enterprise is still in full swing. However, they are not going to destroy our nation.
They hate us, because we stand in the way of their one-world-government. And stand we will!
We might come together as a country, when the last Hate American stops breeding and dies of old age.
These losers in life, since the Viet Nam protesters to their current masked Street Thugs, their hate America Professors/Teachers and their snow flakes will hate us and America until their last breath.
They are life long losers without any redeeming qualities.
Their religion is hating America and those of us who love America.
Hopefully, they will become a footnote in history in the next couple of decades like their ancestors, the KKK!
As they abort their unborn by the millions each year, their demise will be self inflicted along with their deadly addictions and suicidal behavior.
When Deplorable historians write a brief obit, “Here lies the last losers in American life, liberals. Who hated everyone including themselves.
They could not decide what bathroom to use or what sex they were in their miserable life. They and Darwin handled their short and sorry blip in America’s history.
Cats out of the bag, can’t put the bullet back in the gun....
America now knows how deeply corrupt government is at the highest levels...
No going back to business as usual.
Hell no.
No.
No. Now it is impossible to come together.
Are you kidding? There are quite a few around here who are still pissed that they lost the first one.
I honestly don’t want to be united with the left. At all.
They kill babies in utero. There is no room for them on my boat.
America survived the Civil War so America can certainly survive this period of social unrest imo, especially if patriots work to get low-information citizens up to speed on the federal government’s constitutionally limited powers.
We really need to repeal the 16th and ill-conceived 17th Amendments.
“The people who cheer Trump believe the country they inherited from their fathers was a great, good and glorious country, and that the media who detest Trump also despise them.
For such as these, Trump cannot scourge the media often enough.”
Amen to that!
No.
IMO, secession is the only peaceful solution. Barring that, there will be another civil war eventually. We have two “tribes” who have radically different ideas about how to live which are completely incompatible with one another and who do not like each other at all.
><
Winner!
I’m sick and tired of Leftists and want nothing to do with them.
Leftists present a threat and danger to our security, prosperity and freedom. Those things cannot be compromised.
The American people want and demand their country taken back from corrupt, self-serving, amoral, hypocritical Marxist Liberal politicians and everyday, garden-variety lunatic Marxist Liberals scattered throughout the country and MSM.
Trump is not Bush. We all remember how Bush's politeness to the press worked out for him.
I will take back what I said. There was a second time when the country came together again, left and right, for a very brief moment. It occurred immediately after 9/11. That was something to see, and it did make me proud to be an American. But it didn't last very long.
So, no, I generally disagree with your premist that until Barack Obama that liberals and conservatives were at least civil to each other.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.