Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

I’ve believed for years that social security needs to be privatized. Keep those 55 and up on the old system as they phase it out, and start the younger ones out with private accounts. The younger ones will be far better off and get a lot more in the long run.


5 posted on 08/15/2018 9:27:17 AM PDT by sneakers (It's not the democraTIC party! It's the demoCRAT party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: sneakers

“I’ve believed for years that social security needs to be privatized.”

I remember when W fought hard for this. He fought for what seemed like a week right after the 2004 campaign. Then he went into hiding only to come out an threaten his base with amnesty when his poll numbers dipped below 40%.

There are a few reasons why liberals will never sign off on the privatization of social security ... I’m sure you know them :

1> They won’t be able to spend that money.

2> It would validate capitalism.

3> People would be more secure financially (i.e. less likely to vote Democratic).

4> People would pay more attention to the overall health of the economy and see that socialism has an overall negative impact on the economy at large (i.e. less likely to vote Democratic).

5> People would be free to choose where their investments are made (i.e. no way for FedGov scum to steer money to friends as payback). Liberals view choice as “freedom to abort lives”. Everything else is up to them.

If people were ‘forced’ to invest 12-14% of income (i.e. what you and your employer pay into SS) and not allowed to touch it until age 65, a substantial number of people would be financially secure upon retirement. You wouldn’t even have to increase retirement age much per say. Compounding interest is a powerful force in the universe :-).

However, again, for the reasons cited, FedGov scum aren’t too into freedom. It won’t happen.


14 posted on 08/15/2018 9:44:01 AM PDT by edh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: sneakers

Remember President George W. Bush wanted to give the people the choice to voluntarily get social security. He was ridiculed by the left and by some on the right.


24 posted on 08/15/2018 9:57:09 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: sneakers
That idea didn't work out so good for GW Bush.

He advocated offering just 10% of the Social Security account to be privatized and let the future recipients invest and manage it themselves. It would have been voluntary not mandated.

You have thought he wanted to kill the entire SS program according to the democRATS faked outrage at the time (around 2011 I think).

60 posted on 08/15/2018 11:01:46 AM PDT by HotHunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson