I am quite sure I did not say that.
You said the following about the shooters history of road rage incidents and brandishing weapons that has come to light:
“A jury should never see or hear about it.
It would be immaterial and prejudicial to the case.”
So, you are saying that it’s NOT ok to bring up the shooter’s history because it’s “immaterial and prejudicial” to the case.
If that’s the case, then do you also agree that Mcglockton’s “history” should also be “immaterial and prejudicial” to the case?