Okay, I’m not arguing the point.
He’s 48 years old and has 22 years service, what will his retirement be?
My guess is that with 22 years of service at age 48, he is vested in his pension, but not fully vested as in getting 100% benefit. Also, he is not eligible to start collecting same. I don’t know if the Feds still do this, but it used to be the “Rule of 85” where any combination of your age and years of service that equalled 85 allowed you to take full pension benefits. Strzok only has an aggregate 70, so he’s 15 years short.