To: ChicagoConservative27
Taping someone without their knowledge and permission is ILLEGAL. Isn’t it?
4 posted on
08/13/2018 5:37:38 AM PDT by
Carriage Hill
(Life is simpler when you plow around the stump.)
To: carriage_hill
"Taping someone without their knowledge and permission is ILLEGAL. Isn’t it?"
It depends if you are in a two party or one party State in this regard. In a one party state as long as one party to the conversation consents (the taper) it's legal. In two party states both parties to the conversation must consent or its illegal.
To: carriage_hill
It’s legal. DC is one party consent.
However the tape of the firing may have been recorded in the WH Situation Rooom which is an SCIF. Recording things in that room is...not legal.
10 posted on
08/13/2018 5:46:00 AM PDT by
JamesP81
(Traitors are more dangerous than enemies. Vote and act accordingly.)
To: carriage_hill
Not necessarily
Many states have 1-party consent laws
11 posted on
08/13/2018 5:47:58 AM PDT by
silverleaf
(A man who kneels for the national anthem doesn't stand for much of anything)
To: carriage_hill
Taping someone without their knowledge and permission is ILLEGAL. Isn’t it?
Depends on if you're in a one or two-party state. In Texas, it is perfectly legal for me to record you without your knowledge or permission.
To: carriage_hill
In some states ( California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Montana, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Washington State), you need the consent of all parties involved. In DC, you can record any conversation to which you are a party, without needing permission of the other parties
https://www.rcfp.org/reporters-recording-guide/state-state-guide/district-columbia
23 posted on
08/13/2018 6:05:37 AM PDT by
PapaBear3625
("It rubs the rainbow on it's skin or it gets the diversity again!")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson