Now would be a great time to introduce the fairness doctrine. Editorials must say pro or con and both sides of an argument are represented. Commentary masquerading as news will be heavily fined. Violence inciting rhetoric will result in loss of license. If reporters pester instead of asking valid questions (when did you stop beating your wife?) they will lose press privileges.
P
Forced speech is unconstitutional . See the Becerra case decided by SCOTUS in June. Besides do you really think that the press would get a reasoned writer to provide the counterpoint? No, they’d have David Duke write the counterpoint on open borders, to give one example