Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Greetings_Puny_Humans
Free Republic would be protected under the First Amendment. Facebook, which promotes itself as a free and open social space to all people, would not.

FB and FR both have terms of service. FB’s are less restrictive than Jim’s but explicit when you sign up for an account.

On both services anyone can sign up and post until the owner decides that they can’t. For any reason.

There is no difference in a legal sense.

70 posted on 08/11/2018 9:50:18 PM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: semimojo
There is no difference in a legal sense.

Free Republic is an explicitly conservative, right-wing website.

Facebook is not.

That is the difference the courts will look at. And in any case, we can write in the law, "we exempt political/social forums and refer to only social media websites like Facebook." Easy Peazy.

71 posted on 08/11/2018 9:53:21 PM PDT by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson