Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: arrogantsob

“It is also FALSE that the constitution allowed a Conditional Ratification. It was designed to create a “more perfect union” not one that could be unraveled at the whim of a state.”

That’s of course the view that Lincoln held. But as Charles Adams shows in his “Cromwell” essay that isn’t how those who ratified the Constitution saw it.


84 posted on 08/13/2018 1:15:58 PM PDT by Pelham (California, Mexico's socialist colony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]


To: Pelham

That is exactly how Madison and Hamilton saw it. It was explicitly addressed in the New York Ratification Convention. Madison nixed the idea in a letter to Hamilton.

These are the greatest experts on the document which would have never been written but for them.

Washington even warned of the dangers of secession in his “Farewell Address.”

Secession from the Union would be like puncturing a balloon without deflating it.


85 posted on 08/13/2018 1:26:42 PM PDT by arrogantsob (See "Chaos and Mayhem" at Amazon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson