[PreciousLiberty]

'“Virtually every scientist agrees that more CO2 going into the atmosphere causes some warming.”

The big lie, repeated so often that the feeble minded such as yourself believe it, is that there has been warming.'

It's not that it's "repeated so often", it's basic and obvious physics. Again, educate yourself.

"The fact is there hasn’t been any warming. None."

The satellite, balloon sounding, and surface data all refute that statement.

Note the unmistakable warming trend in the observed data.

"Again, I am a scientist, not a Luddite."

You're the most un-scientific "scientist" I've seen. You've yet to cite a single source supporting your crackpot assertions. And of course anointing yourself a "scientist" is simply an appeal to authority, a well known fallacy.

Back up at least one of your incorrect points. How 'bout linking just one peer-reviewed, published paper from a qualified scientist that makes the case for the majority of the observed increase in atmospheric CO2 content NOT being from human activity?

Don't bother responding without it.

[CodeToad]

Sorry, I don’t argue with nitwits. You haven’t a single clue what those charts mean, where the data comes from, or the qualifications to peer review them.

We’ve stopped teaching how to discern facts in this country. People such as yourself run on emotion, so it is easy to lead them by the nose ring using pretty charts.