Posted on 08/08/2018 11:39:01 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
A tornado, albeit a weak one, touched down in New York City last Thursday, in the College Point neighborhood of Queens. A few days earlier, a stronger tornado was spotted near the town of Douglas, in central Massachusetts.
The storms were far from the region in the middle of the country known as Tornado Alley, where the bulk of the nations tornadoes occur. In a summer already marked by simmering heat that researchers have linked to global warming, is climate change also making tornadoes more common in places where they once were infrequent?
Though individual weather events are distinct from the more broadly changing climate, global warming does influence weather patterns. Still, any link between climate change and the frequency of tornadoes is far from straightforward, according to researchers.
Though its not possible to quantify to what degree, if any, climate change played a role in the tornadoes in New York and Massachusetts, researchers have some inkling into how climate change will affect tornadoes more broadly.
When scientists run climate models assuming global average temperatures of one degree Celsius (two degrees Fahrenheit) higher than preindustrial levels - where the Earth currently stands - some show an uptick in tornado frequency, but others do not. That disagreement, however, fades away at two degrees Celsius of warming, the threshold that the Paris climate agreement is intended to avoid. All the models agree that the frequency of tornadoes will increase by that point.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
I remember being in New Hampshire on business on 1 June 2011, a day when an EF-3 tornado struck Springfield, MA and several other twisters were reported in other parts of New England.
Based on coverage from the Boston TV stations, you’d have thought Armageddon was at hand—or at a minimum, it was a latter-day version of the Great Tri-State Tornado of 1925. As someone who grew up in the Mid-South, and spent much of my life in tornado country, it was funny watching the Yankees get flustered. I’ve often said it’s a good thing tornadoes are rare in New York City because if that metropolis faced the tornado threat of say, Oklahoma City, the media hysteria would be off the charts.
That is not a photo from the Worcester MA - Shrewsbury MA tornado of June 9, 1953. That is the Windsor Locks, CT storm, which occurred October 3, 1979.
Damn...
A B-17, B-29, B-47, E-1 Tracer, C-144, P-2 Neptune, a second B-29 maybe? A-3 Skywarrior, B-25, B-57, C-47, HU-16 Albatross, C-119, an A-4?, And possibly a Hellcat, and a P-3 in that pic.
“Windsor Locks, CT storm, which occurred October 3, 1979.”
That explains why the C-47 (flipped upside down near the crane) has the SouthEast Asia camo scheme.
My Mom was single at the time, and she was riding a Worcester City bus, coming down Rte 9 (Boston Turnpike) from Shrewsbury across the Lake Quinsigamond Bridge. She saw the tornado crossing the lake, and said “that’s a funny looking cloud.” She had never seen a tornado before that day, so she had no idea what it was. My parents always talked about that storm.
Ironically, that was the first year the Weather Bureau (forerunner of today’s National Weather Service) allowed forecasters to use the term “tornadoes” in their products. On the day of the Worcester storm, the Boston office recognized the potential tornadic threat, but decided that including it in their forecast might cause public panic. So, as a compromise, they issued the first-ever severe thunderstorm warning for New England.
I’ve heard reports that after the Worcester tornado was on the ground, the Boston weather bureau received several phone calls on the storm from police and the public. Weather radar was in its infancy, and with no additional confirmation, the weather bureau decided not to issue a tornado warning. So, more people died as the twister continued on its path. To be fair, any warning would have been minimally accurate and might have created panic. Then again, some warning is better than no warning, one reason so many people died that day.
It’s a twister Auntie Em!!!
Y’all live in a wide big pile.
A stiff breeze is all it will take.
Magnetic fields are moving.
No, it is George W. Bush’s fault.
Remember he had a Hurricane machine that intentionally targeted democrat voters in New Orleans?
Dick Cheney had a hand in it also.
I gotta get me one of those machines.
simply need to look up references to ‘waterspouts’ in the new englad area for the last 100 years
NTY - is fecal matter now, when merely was what was USED to line the birdcage
Good catch-you are 100% correct, it was on the same page as an article about the 1953 tornado and I conflated them...appreciate the correction.
I know...as an aviation buff, all you can do is look at it and shake your head.
Sigh.
The same feeling I get when I think of those stories I have heard of carriers out in the Pacific coming home after the end of the war, and shoving planes off the sides of the ships. Don’t know if it is true, but the thought is repulsive to me!
Data from Map, "Crunched"
New York has more tornadoes per square mile than 20 other States, Connecticut than 22 and even Maine more than 8!
Note: "[Number Tornadoes per Sq. Mi. * 1,000]" is formatted as Percentage, for clarity.
State | Rank | sq mi | Tornadoes | [Number Tornadoes per Sq. Mi. * 1,000] | Rank |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kansas | 15 | 82,278.36 | 92.4 | 112% | 1 |
Oklahoma | 20 | 69,898.87 | 65.4 | 94% | 2 |
Illinois | 25 | 57,913.55 | 54 | 93% | 3 |
Mississippi | 32 | 48,431.78 | 45.1 | 93% | 4 |
Alabama | 30 | 52,420.07 | 47.1 | 90% | 5 |
Iowa | 26 | 56,272.81 | 49.2 | 87% | 6 |
Florida | 22 | 65,757.70 | 54.6 | 83% | 7 |
Maryland | 42 | 12,405.93 | 9.9 | 80% | 8 |
Louisiana | 31 | 52,378.13 | 39.6 | 76% | 9 |
South Carolina | 40 | 32,020.49 | 23.3 | 73% | 10 |
Arkansas | 29 | 53,178.55 | 38.2 | 72% | 11 |
Nebraska | 16 | 77,347.81 | 54.6 | 71% | 12 |
Tennessee | 36 | 42,144.25 | 29.1 | 69% | 13 |
Indiana | 38 | 36,419.55 | 24.6 | 68% | 14 |
Missouri | 21 | 69,706.99 | 46.7 | 67% | 15 |
Kentucky | 37 | 40,407.80 | 24.2 | 60% | 16 |
Texas | 2 | 268,596.46 | 146.7 | 55% | 17 |
North Carolina | 28 | 53,819.16 | 29.1 | 54% | 18 |
Georgia | 24 | 59,425.15 | 29.4 | 49% | 19 |
Minnesota | 12 | 86,935.83 | 41.9 | 48% | 20 |
Colorado | 8 | 104,093.67 | 49.5 | 48% | 21 |
Ohio | 34 | 44,825.58 | 19.2 | 43% | 22 |
South Dakota | 17 | 77,115.68 | 32.6 | 42% | 23 |
Virginia | 35 | 42,774.93 | 17.7 | 41% | 24 |
Delaware | 49 | 2,488.72 | 1 | 40% | 25 |
Wisconsin | 23 | 65,496.38 | 23.5 | 36% | 26 |
Pennsylvania | 33 | 46,054.35 | 16 | 35% | 27 |
Connecticut | 48 | 5,543.41 | 1.6 | 29% | 28 |
New Jersey | 47 | 8,722.58 | 2 | 23% | 29 |
New York | 27 | 54,554.98 | 9.6 | 18% | 30 |
Michigan | 11 | 96,713.51 | 14.7 | 15% | 31 |
Massachusetts | 44 | 10,554.39 | 1.4 | 13% | 32 |
Rhode Island | 50 | 1,544.89 | 0.2 | 13% | 33 |
Wyoming | 10 | 97,813.01 | 10.9 | 11% | 34 |
West Virginia | 41 | 24,230.04 | 2.4 | 10% | 35 |
New Hampshire | 46 | 9,349.16 | 0.8 | 9% | 36 |
New Mexico | 5 | 121,590.30 | 9.7 | 8% | 37 |
California | 3 | 163,696.32 | 10.6 | 6% | 38 |
Montana | 4 | 147,039.71 | 9.3 | 6% | 39 |
Vermont | 45 | 9,616.36 | 0.6 | 6% | 40 |
Idaho | 14 | 83,568.95 | 4.8 | 6% | 41 |
Maine | 39 | 35,379.74 | 2 | 6% | 42 |
North Dakota | 19 | 70,698.32 | 3.1 | 4% | 43 |
Arizona | 6 | 113,990.30 | 4.6 | 4% | 44 |
Washington | 18 | 71,297.95 | 2.5 | 4% | 45 |
Utah | 13 | 84,896.88 | 2.5 | 3% | 46 |
Oregon | 9 | 98,378.54 | 2.8 | 3% | 47 |
Nevada | 7 | 110,571.82 | 1.9 | 2% | 48 |
Alaska | 1 | 665,384.04 | 0% | 49 | |
Hawaii | 43 | 10,931.72 | 0% | 50 | |
District of Columbia | 68.34 | 0% | 51 |
Can’t imagine that. I was just on that bridge on Monday...:)
Devastation a mile wide. Just astonishing.
In 1992 two tornadoes touched down in New York City during the time Bill Clinton was being nominated by the Democrats for the Presidency.
LOL!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.