[circlecity]

"How about the good old “no standing” argument? Does a lowly district judge have the standing to run the Executive Branch? Congress can codify a big, fat “NO”"

With courts we speak of jurisdiction, not standing. But your point is correct - the constitution gives the legislature unlimited authority to establish, or restrict, the jurisdiction of the Federal Courts as they wish.

[Colo9250]

Lets all send the poor judge a “Get Well Soon” card as he is obviously mentally ill.
Mailing address:
The Honorable John D. Bates
United States District Court Judge
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
333 Constitution Avenue, Northwest
Washington, DC 20001

[NonValueAdded]

and one must wonder if Legislative Entrenchment is unconstitutional, how could Executive Entrenchment, which is what this "judge", is imposing be the opposite?

And does not the "D" in DACA stand for "deferred?" Well, the deferral is up. Congress can codify DACA through the normal legislative process and chooses not to do so, even though urged to address this by the President.

Hey, judge, how 'bout we follow the law?