Anyone who has internet access has access to Infowars.com. They are up and running, not censored. And their response time is quite snappy.
This is a bunch of hyperbolic nonsense.
A bunch of dumbasses think Social Media have an obligation to carry Infowars.
They don’t.
Just like this site won’t let you post one of their articles.
As the “Airwaves’ belong to the People, the Internet, modernity’s ‘Airwaves’ belong to Us. The Tech Giants should not be able to decide what the people have access to.
FR is upfront about its conservative leaning. YouTube, Facebook, Twitter are presented to the public as a social site without obvious or upfront political leaning.
Fort them to ban/shadow ban conservatives, when they have massive control over public discourse, is misleading the public. The media and internet at this time does need oversight and regulation by a conservative authority. Each instance of bias should be exponentially penalized. First occurrence of bias: 1 Million, then 10 Million, then 100million, then 1billion, then 100billion, then 1trillion (Apple just reached a total net worth of 1trillion). So if they have six violations, they'd be left with a few dollars.
.
Social media use our internet, so they are public utilities.
This will end up at SCOTUS, and Alex will win.
Your rant is hyperbole.
.
“Just like this site won’t let you post one of their articles.”
Do you think FR is on par with Facebook, Google, Twitter, or YouTube?
I’m sorry that you just can’t see the forest, for the trees.