the problem though is that conspiracy to commit a felony is a crime. covering up a felony is a crime. accepting
material value for a campaign from a foreign source is a crime. obstruction of justice is a crime.
But I agree that we are far from proving those things so far. What concerns me is how very few of the things Trump has said about that Trump Tower meeting have turned out to be true. The story has changed over and over and over, and always in the direction of more contact with more Russians that more members of the campaign were involved with.
the problem though is that conspiracy to commit a felony is a crime. covering up a felony is a crime. accepting material value for a campaign from a foreign source is a crime. obstruction of justice is a crime.
You must have been watching MSNBC. Those are the far-left talking points.
They do not have any traction.
Talking to Russians is not a crime. So “conspiring to talk to them” is not a crime.
“Accepting material value from a foreign source” is not a crime when there is no substantial value given. That is a particular stretch of the law into nothingness.
There was no acceptance of value from a foreign source, just a meeting is not accepting value, and value has to be substantial.
There can be no obstruction of justice when there is no crime.
All of these things are huge stretches of logic from nothing burgers of opinion and speculation.
I recommend you read Licensed to Lie by Sidney Powell. It shows how this type of prosecution is engaged in by Federal prosecutors, and is completely unethical.
https://www.amazon.com/Licensed-Lie-Exposing-Corruption-Department/dp/1612541496#customerReviews
Perhaps you would like to read this history of unethical actions by former FBI director Mueller.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3676601/posts