How about you post your idealistic TOS for Twitter where they plainly make it clear that they have the right to shadow ban users?
Then FReepers can all judge for ourselves. Thanks in advance.
I’m not on Twitter, thus I have no need to read the TOS.
However, I would never sign a document, or agree to a TOS that I do not understand.
Moreover, I understand that Twitter is controlled by its shareholder, board and executive staff, and should not be administered by the government or people who have no connection with the company.
I asked Twitter a similar question - “Let me (us) post what we want and let the reader decide if they want to block or mute me...they have that option...why are YOU doing it for them??”
This question fell on deaf ears.
I assure you - I have not posted anything profain or abusive, etc. The *only* thing I said to one guy (who didn’t like my pro-Trump stance, of course, and had been tweeting pretty nasty stuff, himself) was “block me, mf” and I did use the acronym.
It has been obvious, to me, that the ONLY IDs that I see banned are folks that post conservative ideas.